- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Entertainment and Media Litigation
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Fiduciary Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
-
December 4, 2024Robins Kaplan Obtains $10.5 Million Post-Verdict in Landmark Aerosol Dust Remover Abuse Case
-
December 2, 2024Robins Kaplan LLP Announces 2025 Partners
-
November 20, 2024Eighth Circuit Affirms U.S. Merchants Victory in Trade Dress Infringement Case
-
December 11, 20242024 Year in Review: eDiscovery and Artificial Intelligence
-
December 12, 2024Strategies for Licensing AI: A Litigation Perspective
-
December 2024A Landmark Victory for Disabled Homeless Veterans: Q&A with the Trial Team
-
November 8, 2024Trademark tensions on the track: Court upholds First Amendment protections in Haas v. Steiner
-
November 8, 2024Destination Skiing And The DOJ's Mountain Merger Challenge
-
September 16, 2022Uber Company Systems Compromised by Widespread Cyber Hack
-
September 15, 2022US Averts Rail Workers Strike With Last-Minute Tentative Deal
-
September 14, 2022Hotter-Than-Expected August Inflation Prompts Massive Wall Street Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Robins Kaplan Obtains $10.5 Million Post-Verdict in Landmark Aerosol Dust Remover Abuse Case
December 4, 2024
Building on the landmark $7.75 million verdict secured in April 2024, Robins Kaplan LLP has achieved a total judgment of nearly $10.5 million against CRC Industries for failing to prevent the foreseeable misuse of its aerosol dust remover products.
The judge presiding over the case recently upheld the jury’s conclusion that CRC Industries' design of its aerosol duster product created foreseeable risks, contributing to the 2019 death of Cynthia McDougall. McDougall was killed when a man, who had huffed CRC Duster, crashed into her car head-on. CRC Industries remains responsible for the entire verdict and post-verdict amount, due to the driver’s intentional misconduct. A request for a new trial by CRC Industries has been denied.
Products like CRC Duster, which are usually marketed as a dust and lint remover, are commonly abused for its intoxicating effects. When huffed, users experience extreme impairment from the chemical used as a propellant. In Minnesota, product manufacturers have a duty to prevent foreseeable misuse of their products. This case highlighted the well-known abuse of aerosol dust remover products, like CRC Duster, and CRC Industries’ neglect to stop such abuse.
Robins Kaplan’s National Mass Tort Group Chair and co-lead attorney Tara Sutton said, "This was the first time a case focused on aerosol duster abuse went to trial. This verdict is a clear statement that manufacturers can no longer ignore the real dangers created by their aerosol dust remover products.”
Robins Kaplan partner and co-lead attorney Philip Sieff added, “No one should ever have to endure the type of loss experienced by Cynthia McDougall’s family. We remain committed to holding companies like CRC Industries accountable for their actions and will continue to fight for justice in the face of such preventable tragedies."
The Robins Kaplan trial team also included attorneys Michael Reif, Rashanda Bruce, and Julie Reynolds.
Related Professionals
Related Publications
In Conversation with Tara Sutton, Head of The Mass Tort Practice at Robins Kaplan
Related News
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.