Trademark tensions on the track: Court upholds First Amendment protections in Haas v. Steiner

By David Martinez and Navin Ramalingam

November 8, 2024

The intersection of trademark law and creative expression continues to evolve, most recently in Haas Automation, Inc. v. Guenther Steiner and Ten Speed Press, 2024 WL 4440914 (C.D. Cal. September 25, 2024). Haas provides fresh insight into how courts analyze trademark claims involving biographical works and sports photography. The court dismissed Haas Automation's lawsuit, which alleged that Steiner's book "Surviving to Drive," infringed on the company's trademarks associated with the Haas F1 racing team. In line with the Supreme Court's decision in Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC, Haas underscores that trademark rights may be curtailed where expressive content is not misleading about its source.

The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.

Disclaimer

David Martinez

Partner

Member of the Executive Board;
Member of the Firm's Diversity Committee;
Pro Bono Chair, Los Angeles Office

Navin Ramalingam

Associate

Pronouns: he/him

Back to Top