3D Printing of Medical Devices: CAD Designers as the Most Realistic Target for Strict, Product Liability

Strict liability, which is traditionally applied in the products liability landscape, is not easily applied in the context of 3D printing of medical products.

2016

The potential framework for tort liability for the 3D printing of medical devices is highly questionable.  Strict liability, which is traditionally applied in the products liability landscape, is not easily applied in the context of 3D printing of medical products.  This problem becomes increasingly troublesome when one considers that  experts predict that the first wave of consumers will suffer grave injuries as a result of defects in these medical products. This paper proposes that the CAD designer of a CAD blueprint should be held strictly liable for defects arising out of its designs. Hospitals and 3D Printer Manufacturers should be held liable only under negligence standards.

The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.

Disclaimer

Related Publications

June 11, 2024
May 17, 2024
Warzone Clash: When Does a Video Game Title Cross the Line Into Trademark Infringement?
David Martinez, Navin Ramalingam - Los Angeles & San Francisco Daily Journal
March 2024
e-Commerce: Pitfalls and Protections
David Martinez, Zac Cohen - Los Angeles Lawyer
March 22, 2024
‘In re Cellect’:
Derrick Carman - New York Law Journal
March 14, 2024
How Many Cases Have You Tried to a Verdict?
Gabriel Berg, Lauren Coppola - New York Law Journal
Back to Top