- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Entertainment and Media Litigation
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Fiduciary Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
-
August 19, 2024Four Partners Named to IAM Strategy 300 List of Leading IP Strategists
-
August 19, 2024Philip Sieff Named Outstanding Trial Lawyer of the Year By Minnesota Association For Justice
-
August 15, 2024Michael Geibelson Named to Lawdragon 500 Leading Global Real Estate Lawyers Guide
-
September 13, 2024LGBTQ Legal Services: Transgender Name Change Clinic
-
September 16, 2024Understanding Trusts Seminar
-
September 17, 2024Hot Torts:
-
August 13, 2024Playing Dungeons & Dragons Makes Me A Better Lawyer
-
August 7, 2024Making a Case for Trade Secret Misappropriation in the US
-
July 24, 2024Navigating Copyright Act Section 117 in Software Licensing and Litigation
-
September 16, 2022Uber Company Systems Compromised by Widespread Cyber Hack
-
September 15, 2022US Averts Rail Workers Strike With Last-Minute Tentative Deal
-
September 14, 2022Hotter-Than-Expected August Inflation Prompts Massive Wall Street Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Litigation Survey
October 29, 2008
Copyright 2008. All rights reserved.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shareholders have seen the value of their holdings plummet to a few pennies on the dollar and are looking for ways to recover some of their losses including through litigation. These shareholders may already be members of existing or proposed classes of shareholders in numerous different securities cases. This litigation survey focuses on current litigation that affects Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac equity investors, both preferred and common stockholders as well as former owners of these equities.
Background
On September 6, 2008, pursuant to the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA), the United States government, in an historic and unprecedented step, placed both The Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) under the conservatorship of a newly established federal agency called the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA). Prior to September 6, 2008, FHFA, which was also created by the HERA legislation, had no operating history or employees. Sweeping changes were swiftly made to the management of both companies, including the dismissal of the CEOs and other top officers as well as the appointment of their replacements. Many of the directors of these two companies resigned from their respective Boards.
Placing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into conservatorship had a devastating effect on the value of the stock of these Companies. Shareholders filed lawsuits against the Companies and their current and former officers and directors. Other lawsuits were filed against third parties such as underwriters and marketers of the Companies' Preferred Stock and Common Stock offerings which had been made within a year of the U.S. government take over. This morass of new litigation was piled on top of the existing litigation which had been filed before to the conservatorship.
Litigation
The litigation can be broken down into two major categories: 1) securities litigation against the Companies and/or their current and former officers and directors, and 2) securities litigation against the Underwriters and/or placement agencies of each Companies' Preferred Stock and Common Stock offerings in the past year.
Matters against the Companies and their Officers and Directors
2003/2004 Time Period
Both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had prior class action securities litigation cases filed in the 2003/2004 time frame regarding accounting irregularities and other claims. Freddie Mac settled its 2003 securities litigation on May 23, 2006 for $410 million. However, Fannie Mae's class action securities action In re Fannie Mae Securities Litigation. No. 04-01639 (D.C. filed September 23, 2004), has not settled and its class was certified in January 2008. The class which was certified is all persons who purchased Fannie Mae common stock, call options or sold put options between April 17, 2001 and December 22, 2004 and suffered losses.
2008 Cases
During 2008, a number of securities litigation matters have been filed against both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and their current and former officers and directors, both prior to and after being placed in conservatorship.
Fannie Mae
On June 25, 2008, a derivative matter was filed against the officers and directors of Fannie Mae and other "Subprime Facilitators" for failing to recognize the problems associated with subprime mortgages. This matter names not only Fannie Mae's officers and directors, but also a number of large mortgage companies that issued the mortgages. This matter is titled Agnes v. Raines, et al., No. 08-01093 (D.C. filed June 25, 2008).
Subsequent to Fannie Mae being placed in conservatorship, two class action cases were filed against the Fannie Mae's existing and former officers and directors. The proposed class is all persons who purchased or acquired the publicly traded securities of Fannie Mae on or about November 9, 2007 through September 5, 2008. The cases are: Genovese v. Ashley, et al., No. 08-07831 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 9, 2008) and Fogel Capital Management, Inc. v. Federal National Home Mortgage Association, et al., No. 08-08096 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 9, 2008). These cases are in the early stages and lead plaintiffs and lead law firms have not been determined.
On September 24, 2008, a motion to stay all proceedings in this litigation was filed by the conservator's attorneys and was an automatic 45 day stay order was entered. The litigation stay has, upon the conservator's motion, been extended until January 6, 2009, with a follow up status conference scheduled for January 9, 2009. This stay affected all of the Fannie Mae cases.
Freddie Mac
A securities class action was filed on January 18, 2008, entitled, Ohio Public Employees Retirement System v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., et al. No. 08-00160 (N.D. Ohio, Jan. 18, 2008), alleging Freddie Mac's failure to disclosure its substantial involvement in the subprime market and misrepresenting its financial condition. The proposed class is from August 1, 2006 through November 23, 2007 and would include all persons who purchased Freddie Mac common stock during the proposed class period.
On August 16, 2008, a second securities class action was filed, Kuriakose v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Company et al., No. 08-07281 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 15, 2008) alleging Freddie Mac's failure to inform and misrepresentations to investors. This lawsuit spawned other similar lawsuits; however, Lead Plaintiff status is still pending. The proposed class is from November 21, 2007 through August 5, 2008 and would include all persons who purchased Freddie Mac common stock during the proposed class period.
The Freddie Mac conservator has not filed for a stay of litigation, as all Freddie Mac cases are still active.
Matters against Underwriters
Both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac made equity offerings during the period of September 25, 2007 through September 5, 2008 to raise additional capital. However, this new capital was insufficient to keep either Company from being placed into conservatorship. A number of lawsuits have been filed against the Underwriters and for placement agents of these new equity offerings alleging misrepresentations in the offering materials.
Fannie Mae
Fannie Mae had a common stock offering on May 8, 2008. On dates below, it made the preferred stock offerings:
Preferred Stock - Series P |
September 25, 2007 |
Preferred Stock - Series Q |
October 4, 2007 |
Preferred Stock - Series R |
November 21, 2007 |
Preferred Stock - Series S |
December 11, 2007 |
Preferred Stock - Series T |
May 13, 2008 |
Securities class action lawsuits have been filed against the Underwriters related to the common stock offering and the preferred stock offerings - Series P, Series S and Series T. Lead Plaintiff status has not been determined in any of these matters.
Freddie Mac
Freddie Mac had one Preferred Stock offering - Series Z - made on December 4, 2007, and no common stock offerings during this time period. Securities class action lawsuits have been filed against the Underwriters related to this preferred stock offering. Lead Plaintiff status has not been determined in any of these matters.
Tables of Cases
Attached are tables of cases for Fannie Mae Securities Litigation and for Freddie Mac Securities Litigation which provide a brief summary of the cases described above including the case name, existing or proposed class, certified or proposed class period, primary Defendants, and primary causes of action.
Case | Class | Class Period | Defendants | Primary Cause of Action | |
In re Federal National Mortgage Association Securities Derivative And ERISA Litigation Filed on: September 23, 2004 Lead Plaintiff(s): Ohio Public Employees Retirement System and the State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio |
Securities, ERISA, and Derivatives Litigation: All persons who purchased Fannie Mae common stock during the Class Period and suffered damages. |
April 17, 2001 through December 22, 2004 |
Fannie Mae, Officers and Directors and KPMG |
Allegations include GAAP violations, egregious misconduct, reckless disregard of GAAP, false and misleading statements, and materially false and misleading |
|
L. Jay Agnes derivatively on Behalf of Fannie Mae a/k/a Federal National Mortgage Association and its share holders and individually v. Franklin D. Raines et al. Filed on: June 25, 2008 |
Derivatives Litigation: Fannie Mae and its shareholders individually |
1998 - 2004; and during the period thereafter and continuing to the present |
Officers and Directors, and "Subprime Facilitators" |
Allegations include breach of fiduciary duty, illegal accounting manipulations, and concealment from 1998 through 2004. |
|
Fogel Capital Management, Inc. v. Federal National Home Mortgage Association et al. Filed on: September 18, 2008 Lead Plaintiff(s): Not Yet Determined |
All persons who purchased or otherwise acquired the publicly traded securities during the Class Period. |
On or about November 9, 2007 through September 5, 2008 |
Fannie Mae, Officers, Directors, and Former Officers |
Allegations include materially false and misleading statements due to a failure to warn investors of undercapitalization. |
|
John A. Genovese v. Stephen B. Ashley et al. Filed on: September 8, 2008 Lead Plaintiff(s): Not Yet Determined |
All persons who purchased or otherwise acquired the publicly traded securities during the Class Period. |
On or about November 16, 2007 through September 5, 2008 |
Former Officers |
Allegations include making false statements, failing to disclose adverse facts, deceiving the investing public regarding Fannie Mae's prospects and business, and artificially inflating prices causing purchase at inflated prices. |
|
Robert Rollins v. Lehman Brothers Inc. et al. Filed on: August 7, 2008 Lead Plaintiff(s): Not Yet Determined |
All persons who purchased COMMON STOCK issued on May 8, 2008 |
On or about May 8, 2008 |
Lehman Brothers Inc. J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. |
The offering Circular and other offering materials moitted to state material facts necessary in order to make the statements, in light of the circumstances in which they were made, not misleading. |
|
Karen Orkin v. Merrill Lynch Filed on September 3, 2008 |
All persons who acquired preferred stock SERIES T during the Class Period and suffered damages. |
On or about May 13, 2008 through September 6, 2008 |
Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. Citigroup Global Markets Inc. Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc. UBS Securities LLC Wachovia Capital Markets LLC and Former Officers |
Allegations include defendants acted knowingly or recklessly in making materially misleading statements and/or omissions during the class period; misrepresented material facts about business, operations and management of Fannie Mae; and artificially inflated market |
|
Nicholas Crisafi and Stella Crisafi Trustees FBO The Crisafi Inter Vivos Trust v. Merrill Lynch et al. Filed on: September 16, 2008 |
|||||
Dennis Sandman v. J.P Morgan Securities Inc. et al. Filed on: September 29, 2008 |
|||||
Brian Jarmain v. Merrill Lynch et al. Filed on: October 3, 2008 Lead Plaintiff(s): Not Yet Determined |
|||||
Malka Krausz v. Federal National Mortgage Association a.k.a. Fannie Mae et al. Filed on: September 11, 2008 |
All persons who acquired preferred stock SERIES S during the Class Period and suffered damages. |
December 11, 2007 through September 5, 2008 |
Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. Goldman Sachs & Co. JPMorgan Securities Banc of America Securities Bear Stearns & Co. Inc. Citigroup Global Markets Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. Morgan Stanley & Co. UBS Securities LLC and Former Officers |
Allegations include: whether the Offering Documents used by defendants to sell the Series S Preferred stock omitted and/or misrepresented material facts about Fannie Mae and its business; and whether the alleged improper conduct by the defendants caused damage to the plaintiff and the class. |
|
Schweiter et al v Merrill Lynch et al. Filed on: October 8, 2008 |
|||||
David Frankfurt, the Frankfurt Family LTD., The David Frankfurt 2000 Family Trust, and The David Frankfurt 2002 Family Trust, v. Lehman Brothers Inc., et al. Filed on: October 7, 2008 Lead Plaintiff(s): Not Yet Determined |
|||||
Donald W. McCauley Jr. v. Merrill Lynch et al. Filed on: September 18, 2008 Lead Plaintiff(s): Not Yet Determined |
All persons who acquired preferred stock SERIES P during the Class Period and suffered damages. |
On our about September 25, 2007 |
Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. Goldman, Sachs & Co. |
The Series P Document and other offering materials omitted to state material facts necessary in order to make the statements, in light of the circumstances in which they were |
|
No Cases Have Been Filed |
All persons who acquired preferred stock SERIES Q during the Class Period and suffered damages. |
On or about October 4, 2007 |
|
|
|
No Cases Have Been Filed |
All persons who acquired preferred stock SERIES R during the Class Period and suffered damages. |
On or about November 21, 2007 |
|
|
Case | Class | Class Period | Defendants | Primary Cause of Action |
Robert Mark v. Goldman Sachs & Co., et al. Filed on: September 23, 2008 Filed Motions for Lead Plaintiff: National Elevator Industry Pension Fund Adam and Tina Kreysar |
Purchasers of Series Z Preferred Stock in the December 4, 2007 initial public offering |
On or about the December 4, 2007 offering |
Goldman Sachs & Co. JPMorgan Chase & Co. Citigroup Global Markets Inc. |
The Offering Circular failed to inform investors of Freddie Mac's exposure to mortgage-related losses, poor underwriting standards and risk management procedures, and the resulting negative impact to Freddie Mac's capital adequacy. |
Jino Kuriakose v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Company, et al. Filed on: August 15, 2008 Filed Motions for Lead Plaintiff: Loy and Beatrice Scurlock The City of Austin Police Retirement System Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pens |
Those who purchased or otherwise acquired Freddie Mac securities during the Class Period |
November 21, 2007 through August 5, 2008 |
Freddie Mac Former Officers |
Failing to inform and misrepresenting to investors, Freddie Mac's exposure to mortgage-related losses, poor underwriting standards and risk management procedures, and the resulting negative impact to Freddie Mac's capital adequacy. |
Ohio Public Employees Retirement System v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation a/k/a Freddie Mac, et al. Filed on: January 18, 2008 Lead Plaintiff: Ohio Public Employees Retirement System |
Those who purchased or otherwise acquired Freddie Mac common stock during the Class Period. |
August 1, 2006 through November 23, 2007 |
Freddie Mac Former Officers Directors |
Violations of federal securities laws, including failing to inform the public that Freddie Mac had substantial involvement in the subprime industry and misrepresenting Freddie Mac's financial condition and results |
CASE SETTLED ON MAY 23, 2006 Ohio Public Employees Retirement System, et al. v. Freddie Mac f.k.a. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, et al. Filed On: June 2003 Lead Plaintiffs: Ohio Public Employees Retirement System and State Teachers Retirement Sy |
Those who purchased or otherwise acquired Freddie Mac common stock during the Class Period. |
July 15, 1999 through November 20, 2003 |
Freddie Mac Former Officers |
Defendants disseminated materially false and/or misleading financial statements, financial information and other public statements |
The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.
Related Professionals
Christopher P. Sullivan
Partner
Richard R. Zabel, C.P.A.
Former SENIOR FORENSIC ACCOUNTANT
Related Publications
Related News
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.