- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Entertainment and Media Litigation
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Fiduciary Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
-
December 5, 2024Jake Holdreith Named to Twin Cities Business Top 100
-
December 4, 2024Robins Kaplan Obtains $10.5 Million Post-Verdict in Landmark Aerosol Dust Remover Abuse Case
-
December 2, 2024Robins Kaplan LLP Announces 2025 Partners
-
December 12, 2024Strategies for Licensing AI: A Litigation Perspective
-
December 2024A Landmark Victory for Disabled Homeless Veterans: Q&A with the Trial Team
-
November 8, 2024Trademark tensions on the track: Court upholds First Amendment protections in Haas v. Steiner
-
November 8, 2024Destination Skiing And The DOJ's Mountain Merger Challenge
-
September 16, 2022Uber Company Systems Compromised by Widespread Cyber Hack
-
September 15, 2022US Averts Rail Workers Strike With Last-Minute Tentative Deal
-
September 14, 2022Hotter-Than-Expected August Inflation Prompts Massive Wall Street Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Minot, North Dakota, Train Derailment
A deadly train derailment in Minot, North Dakota, on January 18, 2002 caused a massive anhydrous ammonia leak.
February 25, 2002
A deadly train derailment occurred in Minot, North Dakota, on January 18, 2002. The derailment occurred at 1:40 a.m. C.S.T. on the western outskirts of Minot, resulting in a massive anhydrous ammonia leak. A total of 31 cars derailed in the incident. Fifteen (15) tankers were carrying the anhydrous ammonia, each carrying 30,000 gallons. At least 7 of the tankers completely ruptured, releasing over 200,000 gallons of anhydrous ammonia. Much of the chemical vaporized in the sub-zero air, forming a toxic cloud that drifted over much of Minot in the early morning hours. As a result of the spill of anhydrous ammonia, one man died and numerous others were treated for chemical exposure. A large number of residents living near the derailment site were evacuated.
The derailment is under investigation by the National Transportation Safety Board. The initial conclusion of the National Transportation Safety Board is that the train derailed due to rail separation.
Medical literature indicates that exposure to anhydrous ammonia can lead to nasopharyngeal and tracheal burns, bronchial and alveolar edema, and airway destruction. It can also cause skin burns and related skin conditions, including dermatitis. Long-term consequences can include chronic lung disease from inhalation, cough, asthma, and lung fibrosis. Ulceration and perforation of the cornea can occur months and weeks after exposure to the anhydrous ammonia, and blindness may ensue. Cataracts and glaucoma are also potential effects. Competent medical care should be sought if symptoms develop after exposure to anhydrous ammonia.
Lawyers with Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P. are presently investigating the cause of the derailment and the long-term health affects to those exposed to the anhydrous ammonia.
The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.
Related Professionals
Philip Sieff
Partner
Related Publications
Related News
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.