- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Entertainment and Media Litigation
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Fiduciary Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
-
December 5, 2024Jake Holdreith Named to Twin Cities Business Top 100
-
December 4, 2024Robins Kaplan Obtains $10.5 Million Post-Verdict in Landmark Aerosol Dust Remover Abuse Case
-
December 2, 2024Robins Kaplan LLP Announces 2025 Partners
-
December 12, 2024Strategies for Licensing AI: A Litigation Perspective
-
December 2024A Landmark Victory for Disabled Homeless Veterans: Q&A with the Trial Team
-
November 8, 2024Trademark tensions on the track: Court upholds First Amendment protections in Haas v. Steiner
-
November 8, 2024Destination Skiing And The DOJ's Mountain Merger Challenge
-
September 16, 2022Uber Company Systems Compromised by Widespread Cyber Hack
-
September 15, 2022US Averts Rail Workers Strike With Last-Minute Tentative Deal
-
September 14, 2022Hotter-Than-Expected August Inflation Prompts Massive Wall Street Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Robins Kaplan LLP Secures Landmark Civil Jury Verdict in Sex Tourism Case
May 15, 2017
Minneapolis, MN—May 15, 2017—National trial firm Robins Kaplan LLP® secured a decisive jury verdict this week, pro bono, in an unprecedented federal lawsuit filed by a sex tourism victim. Robins Kaplan’s victory on behalf of plaintiff Panyia Vang is believed to be the first civil jury verdict in a sex tourism case.
Robins Kaplan presented evidence to the federal court in Minnesota that defendant Thiawachu Prataya, a U.S. citizen, traveled from the U.S. to Laos in 2006 and engaged in a sexual act with 14-year old Vang by using force against her. The evidence showed that she became pregnant as a result of the rape and suffered significant physical and emotional pain from the sexual assault.
On May 11, 2017, the jury returned a complete win for Robins Kaplan’s client on all three issues being considered: the verdict stated that the defendant engaged in a sexual act with the plaintiff by using force against her; the verdict confirmed that the plaintiff was under 16 years of age at the time; and the court awarded Vang $950,000 in damages.
“This verdict vindicates the tremendous courage Panyia Vang had to come forward,” said Patrick M. Arenz, principal at Robins Kaplan and lead trial counsel for Vang. “The verdict also sends a strong message that sex tourism will not be tolerated. U.S. citizens who travel overseas to engage in illicit sexual conduct can be tried and held accountable in federal court.”
Robins Kaplan associate Adam M. Kohnstamm also represented the plaintiff. Linda Miller of the Civil Society served as co-counsel. The Civil Society is a non-profit that provides legal services to victims of sexual assault, human trafficking, and child sex tourism.
The case, Panyia Vang v. Thiawachu Prataya, Case No. 12-cv-1847, was heard before the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota by the Hon. Joan N. Ericksen.
Robins Kaplan has a deep commitment to pro bono matters. The firm placed among the top five firms in the nation for pro bono work, according to the latest rankings by The American Lawyer.
Related Publications
Related News
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.