- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Entertainment and Media Litigation
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Fiduciary Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
-
November 20, 2024Eighth Circuit Affirms U.S. Merchants Victory in Trade Dress Infringement Case
-
November 15, 2024Lauren Coppola Named an Emerging Leader by Profiles in Diversity Journal
-
November 11, 2024Tommy Du Honored With 2024 Sheila Sonenshine Associate Pro Bono Award
-
December 3, 2024Can You Keep a Secret? Privacy Laws and Civil Litigation
-
December 11, 20242024 Year in Review: eDiscovery and Artificial Intelligence
-
December 12, 2024Strategies for Licensing AI: A Litigation Perspective
-
November 8, 2024Trademark tensions on the track: Court upholds First Amendment protections in Haas v. Steiner
-
November 8, 2024Destination Skiing And The DOJ's Mountain Merger Challenge
-
November 6, 2024How Recent Patent Damages Precedent May Increase Reasonable Royalty Awards
-
September 16, 2022Uber Company Systems Compromised by Widespread Cyber Hack
-
September 15, 2022US Averts Rail Workers Strike With Last-Minute Tentative Deal
-
September 14, 2022Hotter-Than-Expected August Inflation Prompts Massive Wall Street Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Federal Circuit Upholds Jury Verdict in Favor of PCT International, Inc. in Patent Infringement Action Against Amphenol Subsidiary Holland Electronics
Rare Permanent Injunction Preserved, Prohibiting the Continued Sale of Infringing Products
August 18, 2016
MINNEAPOLIS, August 18, 2016—The Federal Circuit has summarily upheld a permanent injunction and jury verdict in favor of PCT International, Inc. finding that competitor Holland Electronics—a subsidiary of Amphenol Corporation—infringed PCT’s coaxial cable connector patent.
National trial firm Robins Kaplan LLP® represented PCT in the four-week trial in federal district court in Phoenix, Arizona, which culminated in the jury’s verdict that 60 separate products sold by defendant Holland Electronics infringed PCT’s patent rights. The infringing products include Holland’s SLCU 6 series coaxial cable connector and connectors sold by Holland under the trade name Superlok.
The Federal Circuit’s ruling affirms U.S. District Judge Judge James A. Teilborg’s September 2015 decision to uphold the jury’s verdict on post-trial motions and grant a rare permanent injunction that prohibits Holland Electronics from further infringement for the life of the asserted patent. Holland Electronics was ordered to cease all sales of each of the 60 separate products found to infringe PCT’s patent rights.
“PCT is focused on innovation and product quality,” said Steve Youtsey, CEO of PCT, the Arizona-based manufacturer of products for broadband communication networks. “Today’s ruling supports our commitment to both.”
Christopher Larus, chair of Robins Kaplan’s Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation practice, led the team representing PCT in the four-week trial, during post-trial briefing, and in the appeal. “Our goal from the very start was to obtain a permanent injunction that would prohibit Holland’s continued sales of 60 infringing products,” said Larus. “The Federal Circuit’s decision to uphold this far-reaching injunction will help preserve PCT’s role as an innovator in the telecommunications industry.”
Robins Kaplan attorneys John Harting, Jamie Kurtz, and Bryan Mechell represented PCT at trial; Eric Magnuson, Ryan Dornberger and Brenda Joly also assisted during the appeal.
The case, titled PCT International Incorporated v. Holland Electronics LLC, was heard before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The patent in dispute is United States Patent No. 6,042,422, titled “coaxial cable end connector crimped by axial compression.” Keith Beauchamp of Coppersmith Brockelman PLC served as co-counsel to PCT in the litigation.
About PCT International, Inc.
Founded in 1997 by Steve Youtsey, PCT International is a leading worldwide developer and manufacturer of last mile and access network solutions for broadband communication networks. PCT focuses on innovative and cost-effective solutions that allow service providers to improve system integrity and expand service offerings. PCT’s portfolio includes transmission, connectivity, metro Ethernet and Fiber to the Home products for cable, telco and satellite service providers. PCT’s collaborative approach to product development results in advances that simplify installation and maintenance; improve the integrity of HFC and fiber infrastructures; reduce truck rolls and other associated costs; and most importantly increase customer satisfaction and reduce churn. By working closely with customers’ field engineering personnel, we produce equipment and components that straightforwardly address real needs and enable operators to “Harden the Drop.” To learn more visit, pctcorporate.com.
Related Professionals
Related Publications
Related News
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.