- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Entertainment and Media Litigation
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Fiduciary Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
-
June 17, 2024Emily Tremblay Named IP Rising Star by Euromoney in 2024 Women in Business Law Awards
-
June 17, 2024Three Robins Kaplan Partners Named BTI Client Service All-Stars
-
June 13, 2024Brendan Johnson Named South Dakota Trial Lawyer of The Year
-
June 27, 2024Sex Abuse Litigation
-
June 10-11, 20242024 Probate and Trust Law Section Conference
-
June 11, 2024FBA 2024 Federal Practice Seminar
-
June 2024Robins Kaplan Secures Landmark $7.75 Million Verdict in Aerosol Duster Misuse Case
-
June 2024To Seize or Not to Seize: Campus Protests and Police Uses of Force
-
June 2024Communicating Your Estate Plan: A Helpful Tool, Not a Fix-All
-
September 16, 2022Uber Company Systems Compromised by Widespread Cyber Hack
-
September 15, 2022US Averts Rail Workers Strike With Last-Minute Tentative Deal
-
September 14, 2022Hotter-Than-Expected August Inflation Prompts Massive Wall Street Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Update on DOL Fiduciary Rule
BY MICHAEL REIF
Fall 2021
![SPOTLIGHT_Thumbnail_390x160](/-/media/images/newsletters/spotlight/spotlight_thumbnail_390x160.png?la=en&h=160&w=390&la=en&hash=BB3BB610A9957403D36B443437908AC9)
President Obama and his Department of Labor revived the concept of the fiduciary rule in April of 2015. The subsequent rulemaking process included thousands of pages of commentary, petitions, and days of hearings that ultimately resulted in the April 2016 final rule, which bore an effective date of June 9, 2017, and envisioned a phase-in period through January 1, 2018. The new rule expanded ERISA’s definition of an “investment advice fiduciary,” and it automatically characterized all financial professionals working with retirement plans or giving retirement planning advice as fiduciaries—a status that bound them legally and ethically to a heightened standard. This approach differed from the original rule in two important ways. First, it embodied a “functional approach” to defining investment advice rather than characterizing advice as subject to the rule simply because it was offered by a registered investment advisor (RIA). Second, it loosened the advice requirements, eliminating the needs-focused tailoring and mandating only that the investment advice be directed to the plan, beneficiary, or participant.
Despite the years-long roll-out, enactment of the final rule prompted impacted institutions to prepare for the realities of the rule. Many lobbied against it even as they spent time and money preparing for its ultimate implementation. Even after it was final, the rule continued to be the subject of debate, analysis, scrutiny, and angst, prompting legislative proposals to revoke or rewrite the statutory definition and related exemptions and to delay the rule’s implementation altogether.
The regulatory landscape shifted dramatically, however, with the election of Donald Trump in 2016. Just weeks after taking office, President Trump issued an executive order instructing the Department of Labor review the rule. New Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta soon officially delayed implementing the rule in spring and summer 2017, directed his department to accept additional public comment on it, and eventually pushed back full implementation to July 1, 2019.
While facing this hostility from within the very department that had issued it, the rule was also the subject to multiple external challenges, including a variety of lawsuits that focused on its fundamental legitimacy. Eventually, in March 2018, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the rule altogether in a 2-1 decision that found the rule “unreasonabl[e]” and determined that the DOL had engaged in “an arbitrary and capricious exercise of administrative power” when it enacted the rule in 2016.
Amid the uncertainty created by the 5th Circuit’s ruling, the DOL enacted a temporary enforcement policy that remained in effect until the summer of 2020, when the department released what could be fairly seen as a compromise position. That 2020 guidance formally reinstated the investment advice fiduciary definition in effect since 1975 but added new interpretations that extended its reach regarding retirement accounts—specifically for rollover scenarios—and also proposed a new exemption for conflicted investment advice and principal transactions. In December of 2020, toward the end of the Trump administration, the Department of Labor officially adopted this third effort, and the incoming Biden administration allowed it to become official on February 16, 2021. The still-temporary enforcement policy is scheduled to sunset on December 20, 2021, though the DOL—known for its at-times late action—could still extend the life of the compromise measure even as it debates the prospect of a new rule that hews more closely to the 2016 standard.
Related Professionals
Michael D. Reif
Partner
Related Publications
Related News
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.