- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Entertainment and Media Litigation
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Fiduciary Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
-
November 20, 2024Eighth Circuit Affirms U.S. Merchants Victory in Trade Dress Infringement Case
-
November 15, 2024Lauren Coppola Named an Emerging Leader by Profiles in Diversity Journal
-
November 11, 2024Tommy Du Honored With 2024 Sheila Sonenshine Associate Pro Bono Award
-
December 3, 2024Can You Keep a Secret? Privacy Laws and Civil Litigation
-
December 11, 20242024 Year in Review: eDiscovery and Artificial Intelligence
-
December 12, 2024Strategies for Licensing AI: A Litigation Perspective
-
November 8, 2024Trademark tensions on the track: Court upholds First Amendment protections in Haas v. Steiner
-
November 8, 2024Destination Skiing And The DOJ's Mountain Merger Challenge
-
November 6, 2024How Recent Patent Damages Precedent May Increase Reasonable Royalty Awards
-
September 16, 2022Uber Company Systems Compromised by Widespread Cyber Hack
-
September 15, 2022US Averts Rail Workers Strike With Last-Minute Tentative Deal
-
September 14, 2022Hotter-Than-Expected August Inflation Prompts Massive Wall Street Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
ANDA Litigation Settlements
Summer 2012
Case Name |
Drug |
Patent No(s). |
Publicly Available Terms |
Abbott Labs. v. Teva Pharma. USA Inc., 10-0057, 10-0766, 11-0239, 11-0712 (D. Del.) |
Simcor®(simvastatin niacin extended-release) |
6,080,428 6,129,930 6,406,715 6,469,035 6,676,967 6,746,691 6,818,229 7,011,848 |
N/A |
Medicis Pharma. Corp. v. Perrigo Co., Inc., 11-4963 (S.D.N.Y.) |
Loprox®Shampoo (ciclopirox) |
7,981,909 |
N/A |
Sunovion Pharma. v. Dey Pharma., 06-0113 (D. Del.) |
Xopenex®(levalbuterol hydrochloride) |
5,362,755 5,547,994 5,760,090 5,844,002 6,083,993 6,451,289 |
Mylan may continue selling levalbuterol hydrochloride; Mylan receives a royalty-bearing license to sell a nonconcentrate version of the generic drug, following FDA approval. |
Endo Pharma. Inc. v. Watson Labs. Inc., 10-0138, 11-0575 (D. Del.) |
Lidoderm®(lidocaine transdermal) |
5,741,510 6,096,333 6,096,334 5,827,529 |
Watson may launch its generic product on Sept. 15, 2013, if approved by the FDA; Watson will have an exclusive license to market an authorized generic until the arrival of a third party or until 7.5 months after Watson’s launch; Endo will take 25% of the gross profit from Watson’s sales during the company’s period of exclusivity; Watson will get approximately $96 million worth of branded Lidoderm to sell during the first 8 months of 2013; If Watson does not get FDA approval by January 2014, it will receive $80 million worth of Lidoderm in 2014 over a period of 12 months; If Watson does not get FDA approval by January 2015, it will receive $64 million worth of Lidoderm in 2015 over a period of 9 months. |
Mylan Pharma. Inc. v. Sebelius, 12-0524 (D.D.C.) |
Provigil®(modafinil) |
RE37,516 |
“Pursuant to its agreement with Teva, Mylan is permitted to launch its generic product on Aug. 10, 2012, which is prior to the expiration of the 180-day marketing exclusivity period granted to Teva.” |
Pfizer Inc. v. Teva Parenteral Medicines Inc., 10-0037 (D. Del.) |
Zyvox®(linezolid for injection) |
5,688,792 |
Teva conceded ongoing validity of the ’792 patent; Teva agreed not to sell a product under its ANDA unless authorized by the parties’ licensing agreement. |
Related Publications
Related News
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.