Line design
The United States District Court for the District of Minnesota has found that the American Association for Justice a/k/a Association of Trial Lawyers of America did not abandon its ATLA® and ASSOCIATION OF TRIAL LAWYERS OF AMERICA trademarks after adopting its new corporate name.

MINNEAPOLIS - March 24, 2010 - Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P. announced today that the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota has found as a matter of law that the American Association for Justice a/k/a Association of Trial Lawyers of America ("AAJ/ATLA"), the world's largest plaintiff bar association, did not abandon its ATLA® and ASSOCIATION OF TRIAL LAWYERS OF AMERICA trademarks after adopting its new corporate name as part of a corporate re-branding program.  The ruling now clears the way for AAJ/ALTA to proceed to trial on its trademark infringement action against an entity calling itself The American Trial Lawyers' Association. 

The AAJ is represented in this matter by trial litigation firm Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P.  Christopher K. Larus, partner with Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, said, "This ruling confirms that AAJ/ATLA did not abandon its longstanding trademark rights simply because it adopted a new corporate name.  This case demonstrates that a trademark holder does not abandon its existing trademark rights merely because it adopts a new name." 

AAJ/ATLA adopted the name American Association for Justice  in 2006 to better reflect its mission to promote a fair and effective justice system for all Americans.  Despite this name change, AAJ/ATLA continued to use the ATLA® and ASSOCIATION OF TRIAL LAWYERS OF AMERICA marks, including in its communications to members and in connection with its legal education services and publications.

In 2007 J. Keith Givens, a former AAJ/ATLA member, started a competing plaintiffs lawyers association called "The American Trial Lawyers Association" and used the abbreviations "TATLA" and "TheATLA."   After initial efforts to persuade Givens to adopt a different name for his new organization proved unsuccessful, the AAJ/ATLA sued for trademark infringement under the Federal Lanham Act and for violation of the Anticybersquatting Protection Act.

In addition to finding that AAJ/ATLA had not abandoned its trademark rights, the Court also denied in its entirety the motion for summary judgment brought by Givens and his new organization.  This clears the way for a trial on AAJ/ATLA's claims against Givens and his organization.

No trial date has yet been set.

Related Attorneys

Jump to Page

Robins Kaplan LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek