Line design
More Than $1.2 Billion in Settlements Secured Throughout Litigation

New York, NY—October 7, 2016—Robins Kaplan LLP® is pleased to announce that the last four settlements with defendants in the long-running air cargo antitrust litigation, originally brought in 2006 against nearly three dozen providers of air cargo services, have been granted final approval by the court. Cumulative settlements in the case, all of which have now been approved, surpass $1.2 billion.

On October 5, Judge Brian M. Cogan of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York approved all remaining multimillion-dollar settlements in the case, including a $100 million settlement with Polar Air and a $50 million settlement with Air China.

“Since 2006, we have been honored to pursue this litigation on behalf of those impacted by the defendants’ alleged anticompetitive practices,” said Hollis Salzman, co-lead counsel for the plaintiff class and co-chair of the Antitrust and Trade Regulation practice group at Robins Kaplan in New York. “We are pleased that the court granted final approval to each and every settlement obtained during this litigation, and we look forward to distributing these funds to those who suffered from this alleged collusion.”

In approving separate settlements in March, Judge Cogan praised plaintiffs’ counsel, stating, “I know the plaintiffs’ counsel by experience. They are all top-end lawyers. Judge Gleeson has recognized that in approving the prior settlement, so there is no reason to believe the class has not been well-served.”

The litigation, referred to by the court as “irrefutably complex,” charges many of the world’s largest airlines with participation in a global conspiracy to artificially inflate the price of air cargo shipping services. The plaintiff class, represented by Robins Kaplan and co-lead counsel, alleges that the defendants’ conspiracy affected nearly every business that shipped goods to, from, and within the United States since 2000.

Milestone events that occurred during the litigation include:

  • February 2006: Complaint filed against approximately three dozen air carrier defendants.
  • February 2014: Partial settlements surpass $750 million.
  • October 2014: Magistrate recommends the certification of a direct purchaser plaintiff class.
  • April 2015: A $99 million settlement is reached with EVA Airways, bringing total recoveries to more than $1 billion.
  • July 2015: Court certifies a class of direct purchaser plaintiffs and appoints Robins Kaplan as class counsel.
  • August 2015: Court denies defendants’ motion for summary judgment, grants plaintiffs’ summary judgment motions, and sets trial for 2016.
  • January - February 2016: Settlements with Polar Air and Air China Ltd. are announced, leaving just two holdout defendants.
  • May 2016: With the trial date looming, Air India and Air New Zealand, the last two defendants, agree to settlements of $12.5 million and $35 million, bringing the far-reaching litigation to a successful conclusion.

In criminal antitrust probes running parallel to the civil case, 21 different air cargo providers have pleaded guilty and have agreed to criminal fines of more than $1.8 billion.

Meegan Hollywood of Robins Kaplan also represents the plaintiffs.

The civil litigation, titled In re Air Cargo Shipping Services Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 1775, is pending before Judge Brian M. Cogan and Magistrate Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. 

Jump to Page

Robins Kaplan LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek