In addition to clarifying that proof of actual confusion is not required to recover money damages in a trademark case, the 8th Circuit's decision in Masters has several other practical implications.
Reprinted with permission from InsideCounsel.
In addition to clarifying that proof of actual confusion is not required to recover money damages in a trademark case, the 8th Circuit's decision in Masters has several other practical implications.
Reprinted with permission from InsideCounsel.