In addition to clarifying that proof of actual confusion is not required to recover money damages in a trademark case, the 8th Circuit's decision in Masters has several other practical implications.
Reprinted with permission from InsideCounsel.
When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
